Showing posts with label Risk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Risk. Show all posts

Monday, May 20, 2024

How to Calculate Burning Cost method in XOL Reinsurance Treaties

The burning cost method is a commonly used approach in reinsurance to calculate the premium for excess of loss (XOL) treaties. This method estimates the cost of future claims based on the historical loss experience of the cedant (the insurance company purchasing reinsurance). Here’s an in-depth look at how the burning cost method works:

Overview of the Burning Cost Method

  1. Historical Data Collection:
    • Gather historical loss data over a specified period, typically 5-10 years. This data includes all losses that fall within the layers covered by the XOL treaty.
    • Adjust the losses for inflation and any changes in exposure or underwriting practices to ensure consistency and relevance.
  2. Calculating the Burning Cost:
    • Sum of Losses: Calculate the total incurred losses that fall within the reinsurance layer for each year.
    • Average Annual Losses: Determine the average annual losses by summing the total losses over the period and dividing by the number of years.
    • Exposure Adjustment: Adjust the average annual losses to reflect any changes in exposure (e.g., changes in premium volume, policy count, or sums insured).
  3. Loading for Expenses and Profit:
    • Add a loading factor to the burning cost to cover the reinsurer’s administrative expenses, profit margin, and any contingencies. This is typically expressed as a percentage of the burning cost.
  4. Final Premium Calculation:
    • The final premium for the XOL treaty is the sum of the burning cost and the loading factor.
Formula

Burning Cost = Total Losses in the reinsurance Layer / Number of Years

Reinsurance Premium = Burning Cost + (Burning Cost *Loading Factor)                                          

Example

Suppose an insurance company has the following historical loss data for a reinsurance layer of Kes 1 million in excess of Kes 1 million over a five-year period;

Year

Loss in Layer

2019

                   200,000.00

2020

                   500,000.00

2021

                   300,000.00

2022

                   100,000.00

2023

                   400,000.00







  • ·         Sum of Losses: 200,000 + 500,000 + 300,000 + 100,000 + 400,000 = 1,500,000
  • ·         Average Annual Losses (Burning Cost): 1,500,000 / 5 = 300,000
  • ·         Loading Factor: Suppose the loading factor for expenses and profit is 20%.

Therefore, reinsurance premiums will be calculated as follows;

Reinsurance premium = 300,000 + (300,000 * 0.20) = (300,0000 + 60,000) 

Key Considerations

  • Accuracy of Historical Data: The reliability of the burning cost method heavily depends on the accuracy and relevance of historical loss data.
  • Adjustment for Inflation and Exposure: Proper adjustments for inflation and changes in exposure ensure that the calculated burning cost accurately reflects the current risk environment.
  • Catastrophic Events: This method may need adjustments for catastrophic events, as they can skew historical loss data and may not be fully indicative of future risk.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages:

  • Data-Driven: Relies on actual historical loss data, making it a realistic basis for premium calculation.
  • Simplicity: Relatively straightforward and easy to understand.
  • Transparency: Clear and transparent process for both ceda nts and reinsurers.

Disadvantages:

  • Historical Limitations: May not accurately predict future losses if the historical period is not representative of future risk.
  • Sensitivity to Outliers: Significant losses in the historical period can disproportionately affect the burning cost.
  • Exposure Changes: Requires accurate adjustments for changes in exposure and inflation.

In conclusion, the burning cost method provides a structured approach to pricing XOL reinsurance treaties, leveraging historical loss data to predict future losses and determine appropriate premiums. Its effectiveness depends on the quality of historical data and appropriate adjustments for current risk factors.


Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Management Or Handling ? A Look at insurance claims

Claims Management Or Claims Handling? Issues & Concerns

The claims settlement and underwriting functions are the two most important aspect of the functioning of an insurance company. On taking out an insurance contract, the customer’s anticipations are:

I. Acceptable insurance coverage, which does not leave them high and dry in time of
Need, at the right pricing.

ii Timely    delivery    o ambiguous    fre policy documents with relevant endorsements /
Warranties / conditions / guidelines.

iii. Should a claim happen, proper communication and quick settlement to his contentment

Here, we shall be concentrating on (iii)- occurrence of a claim, as (i) and (ii) relate to the underwriting function. It should however be noted that proper general insurance underwriting of the risk does facilitate claim settlement. Contrasting life insurance, where all policies necessarily result in claims either maturity or death. In general insurance not all policies result in claim. It is approximated that around 15% policies in general insurance result in claims. Claim settlements in general insurance thus have their own distinctiveness and therefore require proper handling. It should be noted that how 15% of policy holders are attended to is of great importance since the services being rendered will determine the attitude of the customers. How the service being rendered is perceived by the customer needs to be kept in mind. Do we have a mechanism to find out the same?


Claims Handling
Insurance companies in Kenya and indeed much of
Africa  have  previouslbeen  handling  the  claims rather than managing them. Typically claims handling involves

i. As soon as a claim is reported, the insurance company checks as to whether the cover was in force at the time of loss and whether the peril is covered under the policy
ii. A surveyor or adjuster is appointed to do the assessment and submits the report.
iii. Insurance company examines the report, calls for relevant supporting documents.
iv. On receipt of survey report and documents, the same are examined. The claim file is processed and settlement is offered.

In  thiwaclaims handling is  thus more process oriented and does not pay adequate attention to the monitoring and  claims cosaspecas  also  to  the service parameters.

Claims management aspects to consider
With cut-throat competition in the local market and indeed much of Africa, the insurance companies have

to go much beyond the handling of claims. The following aspects need to be kept in mind.

I. General insurance is a market driven service industry, the customer has to be kept satisfied. With so many options available, a customer once lost is most likely a loss forever. Claim settlement can be used as a marketing tool. In addition bringing in a new customer is more costly than retaining the existing ones.
II. In a largely de-tariffed market such as ours, pricing will be the key factor. Proper claims management & quick settlement at optimal cost will help keep the
Price competitive.
III. A dissatisfied customer is a bad publicity. It has all th potential   to   damage   th reputation  o the company.  A  majority  of  the  customers complaint
Relate to claims. It should be the exertion of any prudent insurance company to ensure that such complaints do not occur in the first place and in some cases  if  they  do  occur  it  is  attended  promptly,
Efficiently and transparently.
IV. IRA guidelines on claims management effected in July 2012 stipulate certain obligation on the part of insurance  company  including time  limit  for  certain
aspects of the claim process. This is a regulatory requirement and insurance company personnel at every level must understand its implication.
V. Delayed claim settlement generally result in higher
Claims cost. Claims cost is a very important factor to profitability.

Why do delays take place in claim settlement?

Nobody will buy the excuse that the claimant is not forthcoming with documents and other requirements for settlement of claim. Is it because of the delay in submission of survey reports? If so, who is responsible for this? Are we undertaking necessary follow up steps for timely submission of report? The surveyors are duty bound as per IRA regulations to submit report within a stipulated time. Are there service level agreements with the service providers?. Even after submission of report and completion of other requirements how much time does it take to finally issue settlement cheque and its delivery to the claimant? Do we have a system to monitor it? How about our accounts department people meeting the claimant o intermediaries   fo  chang to appreciate “the sensitivity of the client”

VI.  Claims  documentations must  be  monitoreas they progress. A little time spent thinking clearly right from the start will evade lot of unnecessary and time consuming patch-ups and straightening out later on. Unpleasant decisions bore timely with proper justification of the resolution is better than deferment which is bound to create an unpleasant situation.

VII. Proper underwriting is essential as defective underwriting results  in  complication at  the  timof settlement of  claims. Thunderwritinanclaims department     should           not          work       in             segregation. Furthermore Flawed underwriting may saddle the companies with unwanted claims. Any defect / ambiguity in the documents issued invariably goes against insurance companies. It is therefore of utmost


Importance that the client is made aware in very clear terms about what exactly is covered and what is not. There should be a strong system of audit for examining the documents being issued.

VIII. Lot of resources are spent when claim cases go to alternative dispute resolution methodologies such as Ombudsman or Court. Besides, adverse comment bring bad name, when we are held liable. Insurance companies are invariably at the receiving end. The “watch and wait” attitude must change.

IX.  Claims-settlemenhave  social  service  angle which must be met. In times of natural calamity lot of bad publicity comes to insurance company for delay in settlement of claims. This is in spite of the fact that in such situation insurance companies goes out of their way to settle claims at times even on ex-gratia basis. In any case claims relating to the assets of weaker section needs to be attended on priority. So do the health / medical related claims.

In view of the above, it is necessary that Insurance companies manage the claims rather than handling them. Insurance companies have a corporate claims management philosophy Managing claims involves not only claims processing but goes on to cover the entire range of claims management – strategic role, cost monitoring role, service aspect as also the role of people handling the claim.
Out of the total outgo on account of claims it is estimated  that  aroun10  to  15  %  is  because of leakages,  frauds  and  inflated  claims.  In  absolute
terms this will be quite substantial amount. If this can be effectively checked, the benefit can be passed on to the customer by way of reduced premium rates.

Claim Reserving

Claims reserving is also an important part of the overall claim management process. Adequacy of claims reserving is important for any insurance company to meet its claim obligation.
In fact in a study in USA of the insurance companies going bust” 34% (highest) was on account of insufficient reserves (www.irm.com) the analysis of
reserves and the process that goes into making the same and its comparison with past experience can help address such important concerns as;
·       Company’ likel futur obligation on account  of  claims  and  its  ability  to  meet
them. This aspect is usually reserved under
IBNR (Incurred but Not Reported)
·       Solvency  aspect  and  assessing  the  true picture of the financial health.
·       Analysis of claims trend can help to timely initiate remedial action. e.g. restricting a particular class of business.
·       Effectiveness of loss control measure.
·       Average time being taken for the settlement of a claim and the claim settlement ratio and
how it compares with other operators in the market.

The claims management philosophy involves, the company  having  written  corporate  philosophy  on


claims management setting out the broad approach aiming to provide high quality service. It should specify the nature of claim service at each stage of the claim process, the speed of the claim service.

Attitude of the claims Team

It should be ensured that claim department which has to  deal quickly and fairly with all the claims have competent and well trained staff with right attitude. The claimant should not be treated as an intruder. In fact he is  reason foouexistence. The  time-gap between reporting of claim and its ultimate settlement needs to be reduced to the bare minimum. System of time-audit for self-check may be introduced. The approach of people handling claims is important. Emerging challenges cannot be faced with past mind set and approaches. The personnel of insurance company should therefore change their present attitude, behaviour and must show flexibility to effectivel respon to   th requirements   o the markets. They should thus exhibit empathy.  Mere
‘Sympathy will not do.
Lets settle the claim gracefully. Lets enjoy good image on that count. Lets enjoy the confidence and
Good will of our customer for that is the ultimate litmus test for our service. In the likely changes that are going to take place as can be visualized (that is a topic for another day)

Bench Mark

The differentiating factor amongst the various players i the   market will   continue to   b the   pricing, innovative product lines and the quality of service in general and more particular the claims service. If the customer does not get good service everyone is going to pay the penalty and penetration of the industry will continue to be derisory comparatively to other aspects of finance.


Lets see the writing on the wall and lets responds to the needs of the hour positively. We are capable of that -- there is no doubt about it. Our capability commitment must be reflected in our conduct and behaviour so as to change the prevailing perception about us and our service.